Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Uruguay
Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross was 14.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
14.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 2.8%
World rank
7th
of 167 countries
All-time high
15.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
6.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1966
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Uruguay, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Uruguay stood at 14.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 2.8% on the previous year and up 21.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Uruguay peaked at 15.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 6.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
Uruguay ranks 7th of 167 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 6.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 6.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1963 | 7.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1964 | 9.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 1965 | 7.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 1966 | 6.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 1967 | 6.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1968 | 8.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +34.2% |
| 1969 | 8.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1970 | 9.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1971 | 7.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1972 | 7.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1973 | 7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1974 | 8.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1975 | 8.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1976 | 9.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 1977 | 8.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1978 | 7.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1979 | 6.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 1980 | 8.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1981 | 9.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1982 | 9.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1983 | 10.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1984 | 7.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 1985 | 8.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1986 | 7.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1987 | 6.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1988 | 8.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1989 | 8.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1990 | 8.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1991 | 7.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1992 | 8.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1993 | 7.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1994 | 8.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1995 | 8.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1996 | 10.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1997 | 11.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1998 | 11.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1999 | 11.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2000 | 11.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2001 | 7.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 2002 | 10.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 2003 | 10.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2004 | 12.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 2005 | 14.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 2006 | 14.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2007 | 12.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 2008 | 12.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2009 | 12.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2010 | 12.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2011 | 11.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2012 | 12.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2013 | 12.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2014 | 12.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2015 | 13.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2016 | 13.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2017 | 14.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2018 | 14.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2019 | 14.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2020 | 12.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 2021 | 14.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 2022 | 15.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2023 | 14.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 14.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 10.8× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 14.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 5.1× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 6.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 6.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 8.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 6.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 9.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 7.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 11.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 7.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 14.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 13.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 11.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 14.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 12.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 15.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 4 Luxembourg 16.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Switzerland 15.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Malta 15.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Germany 14.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Guatemala 13.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Denmark 13.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Uruguay
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0638 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,609 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0435 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 14.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Uruguay?
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Uruguay was 14.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 15.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 6.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Uruguay rank for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Uruguay ranks 7th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 21.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.