Brazil vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Brazil
4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
4.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
35th
Uganda rank
34th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Brazil
  • Uganda
12345196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 4.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Brazil ranks 35th and Uganda ranks 34th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7714 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5901 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 1.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 2.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6691 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 3.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 4.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6771 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Brazil or Uganda?
Uganda, at 4.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Brazil and Uganda?
0.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Uganda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Brazil ranks 35th and Uganda ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/brazil/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/brazil/uganda/">Brazil vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.