Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Libya

Libya: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita was 43.68 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
43.68 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
up 2.5%
World rank
115th
of 191 countries
All-time high
47.35 kilograms per year per capita
in 2021
All-time low
32.09 kilograms per year per capita
in 2010
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Libya, 2010–2023

010203040502010201620232010: 32.1 kilograms per year per capita2011: 33.9 kilograms per year per capita2012: 34.8 kilograms per year per capita2013: 32.9 kilograms per year per capita2014: 45 kilograms per year per capita2015: 43.3 kilograms per year per capita2016: 39.9 kilograms per year per capita2017: 38 kilograms per year per capita2018: 47.2 kilograms per year per capita2019: 39.3 kilograms per year per capita2020: 41.8 kilograms per year per capita2021: 47.4 kilograms per year per capita2022: 42.6 kilograms per year per capita2023: 43.7 kilograms per year per capita

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

The most recent figure for meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Libya is 43.68 kilograms per year per capita, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of up 2.5% on the previous year and up 32.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Libya peaked at 47.35 kilograms per year per capita in 2021 and was at its lowest, 32.09 kilograms per year per capita, in 2010.

Libya ranks 115th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 38.64 kilograms per year per capita 32.09 kilograms per year per capita 47.22 kilograms per year per capita 10
2020s 43.88 kilograms per year per capita 41.84 kilograms per year per capita 47.35 kilograms per year per capita 4

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 112 Georgia 45.42 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 113 Kiribati 45.09 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 114 Cape Verde 43.85 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 116 Botswana 43.27 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 117 Vanuatu 40.99 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 118 Kyrgyzstan 39.97 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Libya?
Meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Libya was 43.68 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 47.35 kilograms per year per capita in 2021.
What is the lowest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was 32.09 kilograms per year per capita in 2010.
How does Libya rank for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
Libya ranks 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
Is meat supply vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Libya?
Over the last ten years it is up 32.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.