Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Botswana
Botswana: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita was 43.27 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. β¬ Flat
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Botswana, 1961β2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.
Analysis
The most recent figure for meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Botswana is 43.27 kilograms per year per capita, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 8.5% on the previous year and up 80.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Botswana peaked at 51.72 kilograms per year per capita in 1972 and was at its lowest, 11.3 kilograms per year per capita, in 1983.
That places Botswana 116th out of 191 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33.58 kilograms per year per capita | 29.72 kilograms per year per capita | 38.61 kilograms per year per capita | 9 |
| 1970s | 28.37 kilograms per year per capita | 13.78 kilograms per year per capita | 51.72 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 1980s | 18.66 kilograms per year per capita | 11.3 kilograms per year per capita | 27.46 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 1990s | 29.6 kilograms per year per capita | 21.29 kilograms per year per capita | 34.85 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2000s | 25.18 kilograms per year per capita | 20.43 kilograms per year per capita | 28.5 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2010s | 26.32 kilograms per year per capita | 22.83 kilograms per year per capita | 38.39 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2020s | 40.72 kilograms per year per capita | 27.63 kilograms per year per capita | 47.31 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
- 113 Kiribati 45.09 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 114 Cape Verde 43.85 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 115 Libya 43.68 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 117 Vanuatu 40.99 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 118 Kyrgyzstan 39.97 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 119 Azerbaijan 39.43 kilograms per year per capita compare
More agriculture & rural data for Botswana
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 354.96 million current US$ (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 1.8% (2025)
- Rural population 821,007 (2025)
- Rural population growth 0.1% (2025)
- Rural population 32.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.0% (2023)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.8% (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.8% (2025)
- Land under cereal production 60,588 hectares (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Botswana?
- Meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Botswana was 43.27 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 51.72 kilograms per year per capita in 1972.
- What is the lowest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.3 kilograms per year per capita in 1983.
- How does Botswana rank for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
- Botswana ranks 116th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat supply vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is up 80.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.