Kiribati vs Libya: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Kiribati
45.09 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Libya
43.68 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Kiribati rank
114th
Libya rank
116th
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita over time
- Kiribati
- Libya
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 45.09 kilograms per year per capita against 43.68 kilograms per year per capita in Libya, a difference of 1.41 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Kiribati ranks 114th and Libya ranks 116th of 192 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.87 kilograms per year per capita | 38.64 kilograms per year per capita | 6.77 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
| 2020s | 39.12 kilograms per year per capita | 43.88 kilograms per year per capita | 4.75 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat supply vs. gdp per capita, Kiribati or Libya?
- Kiribati, at 45.09 kilograms per year per capita against 43.68 kilograms per year per capita in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat supply vs. gdp per capita between Kiribati and Libya?
- 1.41 kilograms per year per capita, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Libya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Libya rank globally for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
- Kiribati ranks 114th and Libya ranks 116th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.