Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity in Northern America

Northern America: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity was 40,977 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
40,977 t
Change on year
down 47.4%
Rank
7th
of 29 groups
All-time high
85,071 t
in 2011
All-time low
233 t
in 1980
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity in Northern America, 1961–2013

020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

Northern America recorded 40,977 t for hard fibres, other — import quantity in 2013.

That represents a change of down 47.4% on the previous year and up 181.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, hard fibres, other — import quantity in Northern America peaked at 85,071 t in 2011 and was at its lowest, 233 t, in 1980.

That places Northern America 7th out of 29 groups with data for 2013, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity in Northern America, year by year

Annual values for Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity in Northern America, 1961 to 2013.
Year t Change
1961 859 t
1962 915 t +6.5%
1963 534 t -41.6%
1964 4,223 t +690.8%
1965 11,417 t +170.4%
1966 3,185 t -72.1%
1967 713 t -77.6%
1968 498 t -30.2%
1969 1,114 t +123.7%
1970 659 t -40.8%
1971 880 t +33.5%
1972 1,454 t +65.2%
1973 2,400 t +65.1%
1974 2,101 t -12.5%
1975 392 t -81.3%
1976 619 t +57.9%
1977 525 t -15.2%
1978 381 t -27.4%
1979 682 t +79.0%
1980 233 t -65.8%
1981 361 t +54.9%
1982 609 t +68.7%
1983 11,624 t +1808.7%
1984 11,683 t +0.5%
1985 12,875 t +10.2%
1986 17,375 t +35.0%
1987 14,784 t -14.9%
1988 8,021 t -45.7%
1989 5,642 t -29.7%
1990 8,810 t +56.2%
1991 7,809 t -11.4%
1992 8,444 t +8.1%
1993 7,791 t -7.7%
1994 6,745 t -13.4%
1995 10,600 t +57.2%
1996 6,782 t -36.0%
1997 11,032 t +62.7%
1998 13,657 t +23.8%
1999 14,959 t +9.5%
2000 14,487 t -3.2%
2001 12,197 t -15.8%
2002 12,532 t +2.7%
2003 14,540 t +16.0%
2004 22,352 t +53.7%
2005 26,726 t +19.6%
2006 30,309 t +13.4%
2007 31,064 t +2.5%
2008 32,126 t +3.4%
2009 40,990 t +27.6%
2010 58,008 t +41.5%
2011 85,071 t +46.7%
2012 77,947 t -8.4%
2013 40,977 t -47.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 2,606 t 498 t 11,417 t 9
1970s 1,009 t 381 t 2,400 t 10
1980s 8,321 t 233 t 17,375 t 10
1990s 9,663 t 6,745 t 14,959 t 10
2000s 23,732 t 12,197 t 40,990 t 10
2010s 65,501 t 40,977 t 85,071 t 4

Countries ranked near Northern America

  1. 4 Spain 18,922 t compare
  2. 5 Mexico 15,362 t compare
  3. 6 Germany 14,189 t compare
  4. 7 Russian Federation 12,163 t compare
  5. 8 Canada 10,833 t compare
  6. 9 Yugoslav SFR 7,600 t compare
  7. 10 Slovenia 7,032 t compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Northern America

All data for Northern America →

Frequently asked questions

What is hard fibres, other — import quantity in Northern America?
Hard fibres, other — import quantity in Northern America was 40,977 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest hard fibres, other — import quantity recorded in Northern America?
The highest recorded value was 85,071 t in 2011.
What is the lowest hard fibres, other — import quantity recorded in Northern America?
The lowest recorded value was 233 t in 1980.
How does Northern America rank for hard fibres, other — import quantity?
Northern America ranks 7th out of 29 groups with data for 2013.
Is hard fibres, other — import quantity rising or falling in Northern America?
Over the last ten years it is up 181.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Northern America data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity in Northern America. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/hard-fibres-other-import-quantity/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/hard-fibres-other-import-quantity/northern-america/">Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity in Northern America</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 8,660 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.