Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity in Belarus

Belarus: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
0 t
World rank
65th
of 103 countries
All-time high
1,286 t
in 2001
All-time low
0 t
in 1992
Years of data
22
1992–2013

Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity in Belarus, 1992–2013

05001.0k1.5k1992200220131992: 0 t1993: 0 t1994: 0 t1995: 0 t1996: 0 t1997: 0 t1998: 0 t1999: 38 t2000: 35 t2001: 1.3k t2002: 0 t2003: 0 t2004: 18 t2005: 0 t2006: 0 t2007: 0 t2008: 0 t2009: 0 t2010: 0 t2011: 0 t2012: 0 t2013: 0 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 0 t for hard fibres, other — export quantity in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 22 years on record.

Over the whole period, hard fibres, other — export quantity in Belarus peaked at 1,286 t in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1992.

That places Belarus 65th out of 103 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 4.75 t 0 t 38 t 8
2000s 133.9 t 0 t 1,286 t 10
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t 4

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 65 Angola 0 t compare
  2. 65 Argentina 0 t compare
  3. 65 Botswana 0 t compare
  4. 65 Bulgaria 0 t compare
  5. 65 Cambodia 0 t compare
  6. 65 Chile 0 t compare
  7. 65 Colombia 0 t compare
  8. 65 Croatia 0 t compare
  9. 65 Cuba 0 t compare
  10. 65 Czechoslovakia 0 t
  11. 65 Eswatini 0 t compare
  12. 65 Fiji 0 t compare
  13. 65 Georgia 0 t compare
  14. 65 Ghana 0 t compare
  15. 65 Guyana 0 t compare
  16. 65 Honduras 0 t compare
  17. 65 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 t compare
  18. 65 Iraq 0 t compare
  19. 65 Japan 0 t compare
  20. 65 Lebanon 0 t compare
  21. 65 Malawi 0 t compare
  22. 65 Mauritius 0 t compare
  23. 65 Nepal 0 t compare
  24. 65 Nicaragua 0 t compare
  25. 65 Nigeria 0 t compare
  26. 65 North Macedonia 0 t compare
  27. 65 Peru 0 t compare
  28. 65 Republic of Moldova 0 t compare
  29. 65 Romania 0 t compare
  30. 65 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
  31. 65 Togo 0 t compare
  32. 65 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
  33. 65 Ukraine 0 t compare
  34. 65 Yemen 0 t compare
  35. 65 Yugoslav SFR 0 t
  36. 65 Zambia 0 t compare
  37. 65 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
  38. 65 Melanesia 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 133 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is hard fibres, other — export quantity in Belarus?
Hard fibres, other — export quantity in Belarus was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest hard fibres, other — export quantity recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 1,286 t in 2001.
What is the lowest hard fibres, other — export quantity recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1992.
How does Belarus rank for hard fibres, other — export quantity?
Belarus ranks 65th out of 103 countries with data for 2013.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
133 places, 6,522 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.