Figs — Gross Production Value in Syrian Arab Republic
Syrian Arab Republic: Figs — Gross Production Value was 25,352 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▼ Falling
Figs — Gross Production Value in Syrian Arab Republic, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Syrian Arab Republic recorded 25,352 1000 Int$ for figs — gross production value in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.7% on the previous year and down 3.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, figs — gross production value in Syrian Arab Republic peaked at 50,796 1000 Int$ in 1965 and was at its lowest, 20,916 1000 Int$, in 1961.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Figs — Gross Production Value in Syrian Arab Republic, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 20,916 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 41,085 1000 Int$ | +96.4% |
| 1963 | 32,868 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 1964 | 39,591 1000 Int$ | +20.5% |
| 1965 | 50,796 1000 Int$ | +28.3% |
| 1966 | 40,338 1000 Int$ | -20.6% |
| 1967 | 38,844 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 1968 | 39,833 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1969 | 37,448 1000 Int$ | -6.0% |
| 1970 | 32,612 1000 Int$ | -12.9% |
| 1971 | 40,929 1000 Int$ | +25.5% |
| 1972 | 28,624 1000 Int$ | -30.1% |
| 1973 | 22,917 1000 Int$ | -19.9% |
| 1974 | 28,384 1000 Int$ | +23.9% |
| 1975 | 27,034 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1976 | 30,842 1000 Int$ | +14.1% |
| 1977 | 33,929 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 1978 | 26,905 1000 Int$ | -20.7% |
| 1979 | 30,497 1000 Int$ | +13.4% |
| 1980 | 34,846 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1981 | 41,029 1000 Int$ | +17.7% |
| 1982 | 37,935 1000 Int$ | -7.5% |
| 1983 | 38,620 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1984 | 30,593 1000 Int$ | -20.8% |
| 1985 | 26,087 1000 Int$ | -14.7% |
| 1986 | 31,150 1000 Int$ | +19.4% |
| 1987 | 29,371 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 1988 | 39,674 1000 Int$ | +35.1% |
| 1989 | 27,041 1000 Int$ | -31.8% |
| 1990 | 27,564 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1991 | 29,600 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1992 | 34,094 1000 Int$ | +15.2% |
| 1993 | 34,138 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1994 | 28,389 1000 Int$ | -16.8% |
| 1995 | 35,935 1000 Int$ | +26.6% |
| 1996 | 34,752 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 1997 | 33,086 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1998 | 35,145 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 1999 | 31,236 1000 Int$ | -11.1% |
| 2000 | 32,921 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 2001 | 29,894 1000 Int$ | -9.2% |
| 2002 | 32,420 1000 Int$ | +8.4% |
| 2003 | 30,693 1000 Int$ | -5.3% |
| 2004 | 27,412 1000 Int$ | -10.7% |
| 2005 | 37,261 1000 Int$ | +35.9% |
| 2006 | 38,384 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2007 | 30,691 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 2008 | 30,076 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 2009 | 40,132 1000 Int$ | +33.4% |
| 2010 | 30,601 1000 Int$ | -23.7% |
| 2011 | 32,079 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 2012 | 30,794 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 2013 | 34,693 1000 Int$ | +12.7% |
| 2014 | 26,370 1000 Int$ | -24.0% |
| 2015 | 23,590 1000 Int$ | -10.5% |
| 2016 | 29,102 1000 Int$ | +23.4% |
| 2017 | 31,382 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 2018 | 28,412 1000 Int$ | -9.5% |
| 2019 | 32,132 1000 Int$ | +13.1% |
| 2020 | 34,737 1000 Int$ | +8.1% |
| 2021 | 30,624 1000 Int$ | -11.8% |
| 2022 | 29,621 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 2023 | 30,448 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 2024 | 25,352 1000 Int$ | -16.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37,969 1000 Int$ | 20,916 1000 Int$ | 50,796 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 30,267 1000 Int$ | 22,917 1000 Int$ | 40,929 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 33,635 1000 Int$ | 26,087 1000 Int$ | 41,029 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 32,394 1000 Int$ | 27,564 1000 Int$ | 35,935 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 32,988 1000 Int$ | 27,412 1000 Int$ | 40,132 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 29,916 1000 Int$ | 23,590 1000 Int$ | 34,693 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 30,156 1000 Int$ | 25,352 1000 Int$ | 34,737 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Syrian Arab Republic
- 2 Algeria 85,857 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Morocco 79,359 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Afghanistan 44,757 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Spain 27,176 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Saudi Arabia 21,076 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Uzbekistan 20,350 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Tunisia 17,776 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Syrian Arab Republic
- Swine / pigs — Stocks, annual growth rate 30 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate 5.51 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 22.21 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate -13.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fruit Primary — Production 2.00 million t (2024)
- Sheep fat, unrendered — Production 26,890 t (2024)
- Sheep — Stocks 17.93 million An (2024)
- Eggs Primary — Production 135,983 t (2024)
- Eggs Primary — Laying 12,993 1000 An (2024)
- Fruit Primary — Area harvested 264,376 ha (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is figs — gross production value in Syrian Arab Republic?
- Figs — gross production value in Syrian Arab Republic was 25,352 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest figs — gross production value recorded in Syrian Arab Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 50,796 1000 Int$ in 1965.
- What is the lowest figs — gross production value recorded in Syrian Arab Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 20,916 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Syrian Arab Republic rank for figs — gross production value?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 5th out of 8 regions with data for 2024.
- Is figs — gross production value rising or falling in Syrian Arab Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Syrian Arab Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Figs — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.