FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Mauritius

Mauritius: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 74.98 % in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
74.98 %
Change on year
up 3.7%
World rank
48th
of 125 countries
All-time high
79.45 %
in 2019
All-time low
43.69 %
in 2001
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Mauritius, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 58 %2001: 43.7 %2002: 49 %2003: 53.6 %2004: 63.4 %2005: 66.3 %2006: 70 %2007: 68.9 %2008: 68.8 %2009: 68.8 %2010: 71.3 %2011: 64.1 %2012: 68.2 %2013: 72.7 %2014: 71.2 %2015: 70.2 %2016: 71 %2017: 73.7 %2018: 76.6 %2019: 79.5 %2020: 79.1 %2021: 77.3 %2022: 72.3 %2023: 75 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Mauritius is 74.98 %, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.7% on the previous year and up 3.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Mauritius peaked at 79.45 % in 2019 and was at its lowest, 43.69 %, in 2001.

That places Mauritius 48th out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Mauritius, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in Mauritius, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 57.95 %
2001 43.69 % -24.6%
2002 48.95 % +12.0%
2003 53.61 % +9.5%
2004 63.38 % +18.2%
2005 66.27 % +4.6%
2006 69.95 % +5.6%
2007 68.9 % -1.5%
2008 68.76 % -0.2%
2009 68.85 % +0.1%
2010 71.29 % +3.5%
2011 64.13 % -10.0%
2012 68.2 % +6.3%
2013 72.73 % +6.6%
2014 71.18 % -2.1%
2015 70.2 % -1.4%
2016 71.01 % +1.2%
2017 73.72 % +3.8%
2018 76.61 % +3.9%
2019 79.45 % +3.7%
2020 79.11 % -0.4%
2021 77.31 % -2.3%
2022 72.28 % -6.5%
2023 74.98 % +3.7%

Mauritius compared with similar countries

  • Mauritius's 74.98 % is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 59.2 %, 1.3× the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • Mauritius's 74.98 % is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 28.44 %, 2.6× the median. (34 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 61.03 % 43.69 % 69.95 % 10
2010s 71.85 % 64.13 % 79.45 % 10
2020s 75.92 % 72.28 % 79.11 % 4

Countries ranked near Mauritius

  1. 45 Grenada 77.11 % compare
  2. 46 Austria 76.78 % compare
  3. 47 Lithuania 76.22 % compare
  4. 49 Slovenia 74.25 % compare
  5. 50 Uruguay 71.95 % compare
  6. 51 South Africa 71.29 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Mauritius

All data for Mauritius →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Mauritius?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Mauritius was 74.98 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Mauritius?
The highest recorded value was 79.45 % in 2019.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Mauritius?
The lowest recorded value was 43.69 % in 2001.
How does Mauritius rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Mauritius ranks 48th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in Mauritius?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mauritius data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Mauritius. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/mauritius/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Mauritius</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.