FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South Africa

South Africa: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 71.29 % in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
71.29 %
Change on year
down 1.0%
World rank
51st
of 125 countries
All-time high
78.32 %
in 2006
All-time low
69.64 %
in 2002
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South Africa, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 70 %2001: 75.2 %2002: 69.6 %2003: 71.8 %2004: 72 %2005: 77.2 %2006: 78.3 %2007: 77.2 %2008: 74.7 %2009: 76.4 %2010: 77.1 %2011: 77.7 %2012: 76.2 %2013: 76 %2014: 77.3 %2015: 72.6 %2016: 73.7 %2017: 74.4 %2018: 73.5 %2019: 73.5 %2020: 71.7 %2021: 72 %2022: 72 %2023: 71.3 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

South Africa recorded 71.29 % for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in 2023.

That represents a change of down 1.0% on the previous year and down 6.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in South Africa peaked at 78.32 % in 2006 and was at its lowest, 69.64 %, in 2002.

That places South Africa 51st out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South Africa, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in South Africa, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 70.03 %
2001 75.25 % +7.5%
2002 69.64 % -7.5%
2003 71.85 % +3.2%
2004 72.05 % +0.3%
2005 77.19 % +7.1%
2006 78.32 % +1.5%
2007 77.25 % -1.4%
2008 74.68 % -3.3%
2009 76.37 % +2.3%
2010 77.14 % +1.0%
2011 77.73 % +0.8%
2012 76.2 % -2.0%
2013 75.95 % -0.3%
2014 77.26 % +1.7%
2015 72.59 % -6.0%
2016 73.65 % +1.5%
2017 74.41 % +1.0%
2018 73.5 % -1.2%
2019 73.52 % +0.0%
2020 71.72 % -2.4%
2021 71.99 % +0.4%
2022 72.01 % +0.0%
2023 71.29 % -1.0%

South Africa compared with similar countries

  • South Africa's 71.29 % is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 59.2 %, 1.2× the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • South Africa's 71.29 % is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 28.44 %, 2.5× the median. (34 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 74.26 % 69.64 % 78.32 % 10
2010s 75.2 % 72.59 % 77.73 % 10
2020s 71.75 % 71.29 % 72.01 % 4

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 48 Mauritius 74.98 % compare
  2. 49 Slovenia 74.25 % compare
  3. 50 Uruguay 71.95 % compare
  4. 52 Tonga 70.5 % compare
  5. 53 Costa Rica 67.37 % compare
  6. 54 Guatemala 66.82 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in South Africa?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in South Africa was 71.29 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 78.32 % in 2006.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 69.64 % in 2002.
How does South Africa rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
South Africa ranks 51st out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South Africa. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/south-africa/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.