FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Lithuania

Lithuania: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 76.22 % in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
76.22 %
Change on year
up 1.6%
World rank
47th
of 125 countries
All-time high
76.22 %
in 2023
All-time low
49.73 %
in 2000
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Lithuania, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 49.7 %2001: 53.8 %2002: 50.8 %2003: 53.2 %2004: 52.4 %2005: 58.5 %2006: 61 %2007: 65.4 %2008: 71 %2009: 67.6 %2010: 66.7 %2011: 66.3 %2012: 67.7 %2013: 68 %2014: 67.7 %2015: 67.3 %2016: 69.6 %2017: 69.5 %2018: 72.4 %2019: 74.5 %2020: 75.9 %2021: 75.1 %2022: 75 %2023: 76.2 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

Lithuania recorded 76.22 % for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in 2023. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.

The figure is up 1.6% on the previous year and up 12.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Lithuania peaked at 76.22 % in 2023 and was at its lowest, 49.73 %, in 2000.

Lithuania ranks 47th of 125 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in Lithuania, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 49.73 %
2001 53.8 % +8.2%
2002 50.81 % -5.6%
2003 53.18 % +4.7%
2004 52.36 % -1.5%
2005 58.47 % +11.7%
2006 61.03 % +4.4%
2007 65.43 % +7.2%
2008 70.98 % +8.5%
2009 67.63 % -4.7%
2010 66.69 % -1.4%
2011 66.33 % -0.5%
2012 67.71 % +2.1%
2013 68.01 % +0.4%
2014 67.69 % -0.5%
2015 67.32 % -0.5%
2016 69.56 % +3.3%
2017 69.54 % -0.0%
2018 72.36 % +4.1%
2019 74.49 % +2.9%
2020 75.91 % +1.9%
2021 75.14 % -1.0%
2022 75.02 % -0.2%
2023 76.22 % +1.6%

Lithuania compared with similar countries

  • Lithuania's 76.22 % is below the median for high income countries, which is 81.77 %, 93% of the median. (40 countries reporting)
  • Lithuania's 76.22 % is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 78.71 %, 97% of the median. (38 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 58.34 % 49.73 % 70.98 % 10
2010s 68.97 % 66.33 % 74.49 % 10
2020s 75.57 % 75.02 % 76.22 % 4

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 44 Bulgaria 77.12 % compare
  2. 45 Grenada 77.11 % compare
  3. 46 Austria 76.78 % compare
  4. 48 Mauritius 74.98 % compare
  5. 49 Slovenia 74.25 % compare
  6. 50 Uruguay 71.95 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Lithuania?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Lithuania was 76.22 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 76.22 % in 2023.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 49.73 % in 2000.
How does Lithuania rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Lithuania ranks 47th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is up 12.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/lithuania/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.