Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Singapore
Singapore: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0007 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Singapore, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Singapore is 0.0007 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.1% on the previous year and down 32.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Singapore peaked at 0.0047 t per square kilometre in 1969 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 t per square kilometre, in 1985.
That places Singapore 117th out of 146 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Singapore, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.003 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0026 t per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0034 t per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0044 t per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 1965 | 0.003 t per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 1966 | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | -29.2% |
| 1967 | 0.0027 t per square kilometre | +25.2% |
| 1968 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0047 t per square kilometre | +70.8% |
| 1970 | 0.0034 t per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 1971 | 0.0038 t per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1972 | 0.003 t per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 1973 | 0.003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0024 t per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | -55.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 1977 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1978 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | -37.7% |
| 1979 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 1980 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1981 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | -71.4% |
| 1982 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +700.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | +97.9% |
| 1988 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -81.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | +427.8% |
| 1991 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -68.4% |
| 1992 | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | +296.7% |
| 1993 | 0.002 t per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | -67.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 1996 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2001 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2002 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | +59.2% |
| 2003 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 2004 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | +37.1% |
| 2005 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2006 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 2007 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 2008 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2009 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2012 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2013 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2014 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2015 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2016 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2017 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2020 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2022 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
Singapore compared with similar countries
- Singapore's 0.0007 t per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.0018 t per square kilometre, 39% of the median. (45 countries reporting)
- Singapore's 0.0007 t per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.0008 t per square kilometre, 81% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Singapore changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | +700.0% | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre |
| 1990 | +427.8% | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0014 t per square kilometre |
| 1992 | +296.7% | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0018 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0032 t per square kilometre | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | 0.0047 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0038 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.002 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.001 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
- 114 Mozambique 0.0008 t per square kilometre compare
- 115 Thailand 0.0007 t per square kilometre compare
- 116 Paraguay 0.0007 t per square kilometre compare
- 118 Congo 0.0006 t per square kilometre compare
- 119 Malaysia 0.0006 t per square kilometre compare
- 120 El Salvador 0.0006 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Singapore
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -1.4 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 24.33 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.2% (2024)
- Rural population 0.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Singapore?
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Singapore was 0.0007 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0047 t per square kilometre in 1969.
- What is the lowest edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 t per square kilometre in 1985.
- How does Singapore rank for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Singapore ranks 117th out of 146 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is down 32.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.