Congo vs Singapore: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Congo
0.0006 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0007 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
118th
Singapore rank
117th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Congo
  • Singapore
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0007 t per square kilometre against 0.0006 t per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Congo ranks 118th and Singapore ranks 117th of 146 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0031 t per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Congo or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0007 t per square kilometre against 0.0006 t per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Congo and Singapore?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Singapore rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Congo ranks 118th and Singapore ranks 117th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Singapore: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/singapore/">Congo vs Singapore: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.