Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Romania
Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Romania, 1987–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Romania is 0 t per US$ of GDP, measured in 2017.
The figure is down 15.8% on the previous year and down 44.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Romania peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1991 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places Romania 76th out of 166 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Romania, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1988 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1989 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +12.1% |
| 1990 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +56.3% |
| 1991 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +32.8% |
| 1992 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1993 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 1994 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1995 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -37.2% |
| 1996 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1997 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 1998 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -30.7% |
| 1999 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +18.1% |
| 2000 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.2% |
| 2001 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 2002 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2003 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2004 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -32.8% |
| 2005 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 2006 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -32.4% |
| 2007 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -27.8% |
| 2008 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.9% |
| 2009 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +27.6% |
| 2010 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 2011 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 2012 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.7% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +6.3% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +24.0% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
Romania compared with similar countries
- Romania's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 5.2× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Romania's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 1.9× the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 3 |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 8 |
Countries ranked near Romania
More agriculture & rural data for Romania
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 19.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 676.39 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.1768 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4783 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Romania?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Romania was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Romania?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1991.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Romania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Romania rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Romania ranks 76th out of 166 countries with data for 2017.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Romania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 44.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Romania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.