Romania vs Serbia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Romania
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Serbia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Romania rank
76th
Serbia rank
79th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Romania
- Serbia
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 76th and Serbia ranks 79th of 166 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Romania or Serbia?
- Romania, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Romania and Serbia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Serbia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Romania and Serbia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Romania ranks 76th and Serbia ranks 79th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.