Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0677 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Puerto Rico, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Puerto Rico is 0.0677 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.6% on the previous year and down 40.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Puerto Rico peaked at 0.463 t per square kilometre in 1979 and was at its lowest, 0.0677 t per square kilometre, in 2023.
Puerto Rico ranks 77th of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Puerto Rico, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.219 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.223 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1963 | 0.247 t per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1964 | 0.2649 t per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1965 | 0.3026 t per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1966 | 0.3324 t per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1967 | 0.3338 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1968 | 0.3159 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1969 | 0.2979 t per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1970 | 0.298 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.3321 t per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1972 | 0.342 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1973 | 0.3524 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1974 | 0.3667 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1975 | 0.3301 t per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1976 | 0.3466 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1977 | 0.3466 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.4185 t per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 1979 | 0.463 t per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1980 | 0.3634 t per square kilometre | -21.5% |
| 1981 | 0.2818 t per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1982 | 0.2795 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1983 | 0.349 t per square kilometre | +24.9% |
| 1984 | 0.4248 t per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 1985 | 0.4019 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1986 | 0.4182 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1987 | 0.4552 t per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1988 | 0.3655 t per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 1989 | 0.3275 t per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1990 | 0.3445 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1991 | 0.3104 t per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1992 | 0.3383 t per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1993 | 0.308 t per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1994 | 0.2936 t per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1995 | 0.2669 t per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1996 | 0.225 t per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1997 | 0.2586 t per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1998 | 0.2222 t per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1999 | 0.2888 t per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 2000 | 0.2489 t per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2001 | 0.2059 t per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 2002 | 0.1752 t per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2003 | 0.1589 t per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2004 | 0.2071 t per square kilometre | +30.3% |
| 2005 | 0.1613 t per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 2006 | 0.1721 t per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2007 | 0.1596 t per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2008 | 0.1493 t per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2009 | 0.1446 t per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2010 | 0.1356 t per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2011 | 0.1268 t per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2012 | 0.1142 t per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2013 | 0.1133 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 0.1118 t per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.1153 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0998 t per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 2017 | 0.0938 t per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0885 t per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0839 t per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2020 | 0.08 t per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2021 | 0.0753 t per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2022 | 0.0717 t per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2023 | 0.0677 t per square kilometre | -5.6% |
Puerto Rico compared with similar countries
- Puerto Rico's 0.0677 t per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.0504 t per square kilometre, 1.3× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Puerto Rico's 0.0677 t per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0994 t per square kilometre, 68% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2818 t per square kilometre | 0.219 t per square kilometre | 0.3338 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3596 t per square kilometre | 0.298 t per square kilometre | 0.463 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3667 t per square kilometre | 0.2795 t per square kilometre | 0.4552 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2856 t per square kilometre | 0.2222 t per square kilometre | 0.3445 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1783 t per square kilometre | 0.1446 t per square kilometre | 0.2489 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1083 t per square kilometre | 0.0839 t per square kilometre | 0.1356 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0737 t per square kilometre | 0.0677 t per square kilometre | 0.08 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Puerto Rico
- 74 Chad 0.0743 t per square kilometre compare
- 75 Ethiopia 0.0743 t per square kilometre compare
- 76 Honduras 0.069 t per square kilometre compare
- 78 Philippines 0.0676 t per square kilometre compare
- 79 Grenada 0.0659 t per square kilometre compare
- 80 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0656 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Puerto Rico
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 0.4415 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 278.57 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.05 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0566 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.7% (2025)
- Rural population 5.7% (2025)
- Rural population growth -2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Puerto Rico?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Puerto Rico was 0.0677 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The highest recorded value was 0.463 t per square kilometre in 1979.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0677 t per square kilometre in 2023.
- How does Puerto Rico rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Puerto Rico ranks 77th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Puerto Rico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 40.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Puerto Rico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.