Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Ethiopia
0.0743 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0.0677 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
75th
Puerto Rico rank
77th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Puerto Rico
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0.0743 t per square kilometre against 0.0677 t per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0066 t per square kilometre.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 75th and Puerto Rico ranks 77th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0518 t per square kilometre 0.2662 t per square kilometre 0.2144 t per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 0.064 t per square kilometre 0.1783 t per square kilometre 0.1143 t per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 0.0687 t per square kilometre 0.1083 t per square kilometre 0.0396 t per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 0.0749 t per square kilometre 0.0737 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Ethiopia or Puerto Rico?
Ethiopia, at 0.0743 t per square kilometre against 0.0677 t per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Ethiopia and Puerto Rico?
0.0066 t per square kilometre, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Puerto Rico?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Puerto Rico rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Ethiopia ranks 75th and Puerto Rico ranks 77th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/puerto-rico-us/">Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.