Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.166 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
0.166 t per square kilometre
Change on year
down 3.2%
World rank
38th
of 167 countries
All-time high
0.187 t per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
0.0503 t per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Costa Rica, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Costa Rica stood at 0.166 t per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.2% on the previous year and up 1.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Costa Rica peaked at 0.187 t per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.0503 t per square kilometre, in 1962.
Costa Rica ranks 38th of 167 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0576 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0503 t per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0652 t per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 1964 | 0.0668 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1965 | 0.062 t per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0504 t per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1967 | 0.06 t per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1968 | 0.073 t per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 1969 | 0.0788 t per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1970 | 0.0855 t per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0932 t per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0899 t per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1973 | 0.0997 t per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0997 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.1277 t per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 1976 | 0.155 t per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 1977 | 0.1542 t per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1978 | 0.1452 t per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1979 | 0.1603 t per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1980 | 0.1468 t per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1981 | 0.1535 t per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1982 | 0.1266 t per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 1983 | 0.1285 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1984 | 0.1473 t per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1985 | 0.1794 t per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1986 | 0.1765 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1987 | 0.1861 t per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1988 | 0.165 t per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1989 | 0.164 t per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1990 | 0.1678 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1991 | 0.1803 t per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1992 | 0.1552 t per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1993 | 0.1571 t per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1994 | 0.1831 t per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1995 | 0.1795 t per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1996 | 0.185 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1997 | 0.1653 t per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1998 | 0.1574 t per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1999 | 0.162 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2000 | 0.1578 t per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2001 | 0.1426 t per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2002 | 0.1311 t per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2003 | 0.1422 t per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2004 | 0.1343 t per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2005 | 0.1549 t per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2006 | 0.1445 t per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2007 | 0.1551 t per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2008 | 0.1679 t per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2009 | 0.1815 t per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2010 | 0.187 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2011 | 0.1842 t per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2012 | 0.1679 t per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2013 | 0.1631 t per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2014 | 0.1692 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2015 | 0.1573 t per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2016 | 0.14 t per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2017 | 0.1496 t per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2018 | 0.1558 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2019 | 0.17 t per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2020 | 0.1722 t per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2021 | 0.1793 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2022 | 0.1715 t per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2023 | 0.166 t per square kilometre | -3.2% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 0.166 t per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.0504 t per square kilometre, 3.3× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 0.166 t per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0994 t per square kilometre, 1.7× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0627 t per square kilometre | 0.0503 t per square kilometre | 0.0788 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.121 t per square kilometre | 0.0855 t per square kilometre | 0.1603 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1574 t per square kilometre | 0.1266 t per square kilometre | 0.1861 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1693 t per square kilometre | 0.1552 t per square kilometre | 0.185 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1512 t per square kilometre | 0.1311 t per square kilometre | 0.1815 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1644 t per square kilometre | 0.14 t per square kilometre | 0.187 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1722 t per square kilometre | 0.166 t per square kilometre | 0.1793 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 35 Dominican Republic 0.1884 t per square kilometre compare
- 36 Spain 0.1834 t per square kilometre compare
- 37 Mexico 0.1772 t per square kilometre compare
- 39 China 0.1574 t per square kilometre compare
- 40 Paraguay 0.1574 t per square kilometre compare
- 41 El Salvador 0.1539 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Costa Rica
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.56 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0337 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 672.15 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.57 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2027 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Costa Rica?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Costa Rica was 0.166 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 0.187 t per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0503 t per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Costa Rica rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Costa Rica ranks 38th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.