Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Belize
Belize: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0102 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
0.0102 t per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.2%
World rank
140th
of 167 countries
All-time high
0.0143 t per square kilometre
in 2004
All-time low
0.0019 t per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Belize, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Belize stood at 0.0102 t per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 1.2% on the previous year and up 2.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Belize peaked at 0.0143 t per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0.0019 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Belize 140th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Belize, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0019 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0026 t per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0025 t per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0026 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1967 | 0.0029 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1968 | 0.0032 t per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 1970 | 0.0025 t per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0037 t per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0041 t per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1973 | 0.0055 t per square kilometre | +33.7% |
| 1974 | 0.0046 t per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1975 | 0.0044 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1976 | 0.0051 t per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1977 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1978 | 0.0063 t per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1979 | 0.0061 t per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1980 | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1981 | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0047 t per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1983 | 0.0052 t per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0066 t per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1986 | 0.0059 t per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 1988 | 0.0049 t per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1989 | 0.0051 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1990 | 0.0078 t per square kilometre | +52.7% |
| 1991 | 0.0076 t per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1992 | 0.0081 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0073 t per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0067 t per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1995 | 0.0079 t per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0063 t per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0063 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0062 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0061 t per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0079 t per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 2002 | 0.0099 t per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0119 t per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2004 | 0.0143 t per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 2005 | 0.0087 t per square kilometre | -39.3% |
| 2006 | 0.009 t per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0087 t per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2008 | 0.0092 t per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0087 t per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2010 | 0.0081 t per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0086 t per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0089 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2013 | 0.0099 t per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0083 t per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0086 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0078 t per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2017 | 0.008 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0096 t per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2019 | 0.0094 t per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2020 | 0.0085 t per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2021 | 0.0089 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2022 | 0.01 t per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2023 | 0.0102 t per square kilometre | +1.2% |
Belize compared with similar countries
- Belize's 0.0102 t per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0803 t per square kilometre, 13% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Belize's 0.0102 t per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0994 t per square kilometre, 10% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0026 t per square kilometre | 0.0019 t per square kilometre | 0.0032 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0048 t per square kilometre | 0.0025 t per square kilometre | 0.0063 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | 0.0047 t per square kilometre | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | 0.0062 t per square kilometre | 0.0081 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0094 t per square kilometre | 0.0061 t per square kilometre | 0.0143 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0087 t per square kilometre | 0.0078 t per square kilometre | 0.0099 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0094 t per square kilometre | 0.0085 t per square kilometre | 0.0102 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belize
- 137 Niger 0.011 t per square kilometre compare
- 138 Madagascar 0.011 t per square kilometre compare
- 139 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0107 t per square kilometre compare
- 141 Oman 0.0101 t per square kilometre compare
- 142 Malaysia 0.0097 t per square kilometre compare
- 143 Faroe Islands 0.0097 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Belize
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 2.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0795 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 610.5 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.5844 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 7.9% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 7.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.9% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Belize?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Belize was 0.0102 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Belize?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0143 t per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Belize?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0019 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Belize rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Belize ranks 140th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Belize?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belize data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.