Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Antigua and Barbuda
Antigua and Barbuda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0107 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Antigua and Barbuda, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Antigua and Barbuda stood at 0.0107 t per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is down 36.8% on the previous year and down 75.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Antigua and Barbuda peaked at 0.1614 t per square kilometre in 1985 and was at its lowest, 0.0107 t per square kilometre, in 2023.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 139th of 167 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Antigua and Barbuda, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0673 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0436 t per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 1963 | 0.053 t per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1964 | 0.07 t per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0592 t per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 1966 | 0.064 t per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1967 | 0.043 t per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 1968 | 0.0371 t per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0463 t per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0473 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1971 | 0.0826 t per square kilometre | +74.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0769 t per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1973 | 0.0748 t per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0686 t per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | -41.2% |
| 1976 | 0.0508 t per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1977 | 0.067 t per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 1978 | 0.109 t per square kilometre | +62.7% |
| 1979 | 0.1154 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1980 | 0.1369 t per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1981 | 0.1259 t per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1982 | 0.1116 t per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1983 | 0.1229 t per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1984 | 0.113 t per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1985 | 0.1614 t per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 1986 | 0.1614 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.1614 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.1614 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.1211 t per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1990 | 0.1399 t per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1991 | 0.0868 t per square kilometre | -37.9% |
| 1992 | 0.0538 t per square kilometre | -38.1% |
| 1993 | 0.047 t per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1994 | 0.0426 t per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1995 | 0.0405 t per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0387 t per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1997 | 0.0388 t per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0389 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0407 t per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.0531 t per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0431 t per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2002 | 0.0422 t per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0438 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2004 | 0.0437 t per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0437 t per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2007 | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0398 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0409 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2012 | 0.042 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2013 | 0.0428 t per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0395 t per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2015 | 0.0392 t per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.0257 t per square kilometre | -34.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0229 t per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2018 | 0.0205 t per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0161 t per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 2020 | 0.0179 t per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2021 | 0.0153 t per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0169 t per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2023 | 0.0107 t per square kilometre | -36.8% |
Antigua and Barbuda compared with similar countries
- Antigua and Barbuda's 0.0107 t per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.0504 t per square kilometre, 21% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Antigua and Barbuda's 0.0107 t per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0994 t per square kilometre, 11% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0537 t per square kilometre | 0.0371 t per square kilometre | 0.07 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0733 t per square kilometre | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | 0.1154 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1377 t per square kilometre | 0.1116 t per square kilometre | 0.1614 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0568 t per square kilometre | 0.0387 t per square kilometre | 0.1399 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0431 t per square kilometre | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | 0.0531 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0329 t per square kilometre | 0.0161 t per square kilometre | 0.0428 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0152 t per square kilometre | 0.0107 t per square kilometre | 0.0179 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Antigua and Barbuda
More agriculture & rural data for Antigua and Barbuda
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2764 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0149 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 368.76 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.543 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.7567 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Antigua and Barbuda was 0.0107 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1614 t per square kilometre in 1985.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0107 t per square kilometre in 2023.
- How does Antigua and Barbuda rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 139th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 75.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Antigua and Barbuda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.