Cotton lint — Stock Variation in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Cotton lint — Stock Variation was 0 t in 2013. ▬ Flat
Cotton lint — Stock Variation in Russian Federation, 1992–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cotton lint — stock variation in Russian Federation is 0 t, measured in 2013.
Over the whole period, cotton lint — stock variation in Russian Federation peaked at 50,000 t in 2002 and was at its lowest, -50,000 t, in 2001.
That places Russian Federation 15th out of 66 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top quarter.
Cotton lint — Stock Variation in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 t | — |
| 1993 | 0 t | — |
| 1994 | 0 t | — |
| 1995 | 0 t | — |
| 1996 | 0 t | — |
| 1997 | 0 t | — |
| 1998 | 0 t | — |
| 1999 | 0 t | — |
| 2000 | 0 t | — |
| 2001 | -50,000 t | — |
| 2002 | 50,000 t | -200.0% |
| 2003 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2004 | 0 t | — |
| 2005 | 0 t | — |
| 2006 | 0 t | — |
| 2007 | 0 t | — |
| 2008 | 0 t | — |
| 2009 | 0 t | — |
| 2010 | 0 t | — |
| 2011 | 0 t | — |
| 2012 | 0 t | — |
| 2013 | 0 t | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 t | -50,000 t | 50,000 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
- 12 Togo 3,400 t compare
- 13 Cambodia 30 t compare
- 13 Latvia 30 t compare
- 15 Angola 0 t compare
- 15 Argentina 0 t compare
- 15 Azerbaijan 0 t compare
- 15 Belgium 0 t compare
- 15 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 t compare
- 15 Botswana 0 t compare
- 15 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 15 Central African Republic 0 t compare
- 15 Chad 0 t compare
- 15 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 15 Denmark 0 t compare
- 15 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 15 Estonia 0 t compare
- 15 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 15 Finland 0 t compare
- 15 Gambia 0 t compare
- 15 Georgia 0 t compare
- 15 Ghana 0 t compare
- 15 Greece 0 t compare
- 15 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 15 Guinea-Bissau 0 t compare
- 15 Honduras 0 t compare
- 15 Jamaica 0 t compare
- 15 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 15 Kenya 0 t compare
- 15 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 15 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 15 Madagascar 0 t compare
- 15 Malawi 0 t compare
- 15 Mozambique 0 t compare
- 15 Myanmar 0 t compare
- 15 Namibia 0 t compare
- 15 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 15 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 15 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 15 Niger 0 t compare
- 15 Nigeria 0 t compare
- 15 Peru 0 t compare
- 15 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 t compare
- 15 Spain 0 t compare
- 15 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 15 Tajikistan 0 t compare
- 15 Turkmenistan 0 t compare
- 15 Uganda 0 t compare
- 15 Ukraine 0 t compare
- 15 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 15 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 15 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 15 Yemen 0 t compare
- 15 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
- 16 Caribbean 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Russian Federation
- Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) 0.1967 % change on previous year (2024)
- Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) -6.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross 2.01 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production 2.21 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value -6.37 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value -0.6158 % change on previous year (2024)
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Gross Production -1.64 % change on previous year (2024)
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) -27 % change on previous year (2024)
- Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant) -20.71 % change on previous year (2024)
- Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) -4.12 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cotton lint — stock variation in Russian Federation?
- Cotton lint — stock variation in Russian Federation was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest cotton lint — stock variation recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 50,000 t in 2002.
- What is the lowest cotton lint — stock variation recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was -50,000 t in 2001.
- How does Russian Federation rank for cotton lint — stock variation?
- Russian Federation ranks 15th out of 66 countries with data for 2013.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Cotton lint — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.