2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde: 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures was 0.49 in 2023. ▼ Falling
2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Cabo Verde, 2001–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Cabo Verde is 0.49, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 23.4% on the previous year and down 38.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Cabo Verde peaked at 1.14 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.31, in 2021.
Cabo Verde ranks 5th of 33 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.
2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Cabo Verde, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0.74 | — |
| 2002 | 0.87 | +17.6% |
| 2003 | 0.81 | -6.9% |
| 2004 | 0.49 | -39.5% |
| 2005 | 0.62 | +26.5% |
| 2006 | 0.59 | -4.8% |
| 2007 | 0.89 | +50.8% |
| 2008 | 0.66 | -25.8% |
| 2009 | 0.72 | +9.1% |
| 2010 | 0.61 | -15.3% |
| 2011 | 1.14 | +86.9% |
| 2012 | 0.89 | -21.9% |
| 2013 | 0.8 | -10.1% |
| 2014 | 0.68 | -15.0% |
| 2015 | 0.79 | +16.2% |
| 2016 | 0.48 | -39.2% |
| 2017 | 0.52 | +8.3% |
| 2018 | 0.65 | +25.0% |
| 2019 | 0.52 | -20.0% |
| 2020 | 0.39 | -25.0% |
| 2021 | 0.31 | -20.5% |
| 2022 | 0.64 | +106.5% |
| 2023 | 0.49 | -23.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.89 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.708 | 0.48 | 1.14 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4575 | 0.31 | 0.64 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cabo Verde
- 2 South Sudan 4.57 compare
- 3 Luxembourg 4.32 compare
- 4 China, Hong Kong SAR 3.67 compare
- 4 Türkiye 0.44 compare
- 5 Switzerland 3.08 compare
- 5 Viet Nam 0.4 compare
- 6 Malta 2.29 compare
- 7 Republic of Korea 2.28 compare
- 8 Zambia 2.21 compare
More agriculture & rural data for Cabo Verde
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing 1 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual 1.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fat of pigs — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate 1 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fat of pigs — Production, annual growth rate 1.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing 1 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual 1.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate -81.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate -79.72 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate -11.28 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Cabo Verde?
- 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Cabo Verde was 0.49 in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures recorded in Cabo Verde?
- The highest recorded value was 1.14 in 2011.
- What is the lowest 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures recorded in Cabo Verde?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.31 in 2021.
- How does Cabo Verde rank for 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures?
- Cabo Verde ranks 5th out of 33 countries with data for 2023.
- Is 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures rising or falling in Cabo Verde?
- Over the last ten years it is down 38.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cabo Verde data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.