Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Philippines: Tobacco — Losses

Lao People's Democratic Republic
2,839 t
in 2013
Philippines
5,503 t
in 2013
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
4th
Philippines rank
3rd

Tobacco — Losses over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Philippines
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119872013

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 5,503 t against 2,839 t in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 2,664 t.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.9 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 4th and Philippines ranks 3rd of 5 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 911.89 t 3,090 t 2,178 t Philippines
1970s 1,356 t 3,239 t 1,884 t Philippines
1980s 736.6 t 4,594 t 3,857 t Philippines
1990s 1,493 t 4,779 t 3,286 t Philippines
2000s 1,483 t 4,494 t 3,011 t Philippines
2010s 2,759 t 4,854 t 2,094 t Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tobacco — losses, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Philippines?
Philippines, at 5,503 t against 2,839 t in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2013.
What is the difference in tobacco — losses between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Philippines?
2,664 t, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Philippines?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Philippines rank globally for tobacco — losses?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 4th and Philippines ranks 3rd of 5 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tobacco — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Philippines: Tobacco — Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-losses/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-losses/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/philippines/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Philippines: Tobacco — Losses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tobacco — Losses
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
45 places, 2,327 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.