Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Sugar cane — Processing

Australia and New Zealand
28,834 1000 t
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
46,759 1000 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd

Sugar cane — Processing over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k201020162023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 46,759 1000 t against 28,834 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 17,925 1000 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 1.6 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 76 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 29,631 1000 t 45,634 1000 t 16,003 1000 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 29,138 1000 t 47,798 1000 t 18,660 1000 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — processing, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 46,759 1000 t against 28,834 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — processing between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
17,925 1000 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for sugar cane — processing?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 76 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Sugar cane — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-processing/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-processing/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Sugar cane — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
113 places, 1,542 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.