Belgium vs Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Soft-Fibres, Other — Production

Belgium
67,300 t
in 2013
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
14,000 t
in 2013
Belgium rank
4th
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
2nd

Soft-Fibres, Other — Production over time

  • Belgium
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119872013

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 67,300 t against 14,000 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 53,300 t.

That makes Belgium's figure about 4.8 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 4th and Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 45 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Democratic People's Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 16,491 t 13,029 t 3,462 t Belgium
2010s 60,075 t 14,000 t 46,075 t Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other — production, Belgium or Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
Belgium, at 67,300 t against 14,000 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2013.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other — production between Belgium and Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
53,300 t, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
How do Belgium and Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank globally for soft-fibres, other — production?
Belgium ranks 4th and Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 45 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Soft-Fibres, Other — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-production/belgium/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-production/belgium/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/">Belgium vs Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Soft-Fibres, Other — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
67 places, 3,113 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.