Angola vs Small Island Developing States: Sisal — Production

Angola
652 t
in 2013
Small Island Developing States
9,935 t
in 2013
Angola rank
13th
Small Island Developing States rank
12th

Sisal — Production over time

  • Angola
  • Small Island Developing States
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119872013

How they compare

Small Island Developing States currently reports 9,935 t against 652 t in Angola, a difference of 9,283 t.

That makes Small Island Developing States's figure about 15.2 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 13th and Small Island Developing States ranks 12th of 23 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Small Island Developing States in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Small Island Developing States Difference Ahead
1960s 65,528 t 24,353 t 41,175 t Angola
1970s 45,680 t 19,968 t 25,712 t Angola
1980s 2,400 t 16,960 t 14,560 t Small Island Developing States
1990s 673.5 t 13,912 t 13,239 t Small Island Developing States
2000s 462.3 t 7,340 t 6,878 t Small Island Developing States
2010s 609 t 9,712 t 9,104 t Small Island Developing States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sisal — production, Angola or Small Island Developing States?
Small Island Developing States, at 9,935 t against 652 t in Angola as of 2013.
What is the difference in sisal — production between Angola and Small Island Developing States?
9,283 t, with Small Island Developing States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Small Island Developing States?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Angola and Small Island Developing States rank globally for sisal — production?
Angola ranks 13th and Small Island Developing States ranks 12th of 23 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sisal — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Small Island Developing States: Sisal — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-production/angola/small-island-developing-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-production/angola/small-island-developing-states/">Angola vs Small Island Developing States: Sisal — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sisal — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
43 places, 2,226 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.