Least Developed Countries vs Yugoslav SFR: Silk — Production

Least Developed Countries
1,034 t
in 2013
Yugoslav SFR
225 t
in 1991
Least Developed Countries rank
14th
Yugoslav SFR rank
15th

Silk — Production over time

  • Least Developed Countries
  • Yugoslav SFR
05001.0k1.5k196119872013

How they compare

Least Developed Countries currently reports 1,034 t against 225 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 809 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries's figure about 4.6 times Yugoslav SFR's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries ranks 14th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 15th of 20 groups.

Least Developed Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 934.11 t 393.56 t 540.56 t Least Developed Countries
1970s 1,006 t 193.3 t 812.8 t Least Developed Countries
1980s 787.7 t 222 t 565.7 t Least Developed Countries
1990s 774.5 t 225 t 549.5 t Least Developed Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk — production, Least Developed Countries or Yugoslav SFR?
Least Developed Countries, at 1,034 t against 225 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2013.
What is the difference in silk — production between Least Developed Countries and Yugoslav SFR?
809 t, with Least Developed Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries and Yugoslav SFR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Least Developed Countries and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for silk — production?
Least Developed Countries ranks 14th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 15th of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries vs Yugoslav SFR: Silk — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-production/least-developed-countries/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-production/least-developed-countries/yugoslav-sfr/">Least Developed Countries vs Yugoslav SFR: Silk — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
55 places, 2,685 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.