Land Locked Developing Countries vs Malaysia: Rubber — Production

Land Locked Developing Countries
19,500 t
in 2013
Malaysia
826,421 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
4th
Malaysia rank
5th

Rubber — Production over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries
  • Malaysia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119872013

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 826,421 t against 19,500 t in Land Locked Developing Countries, a difference of 806,921 t.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 42.4 times Land Locked Developing Countries's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th and Malaysia ranks 5th of 6 groups.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 3,074 t 948,162 t 945,088 t Malaysia
1970s 3,964 t 1.48 million t 1.47 million t Malaysia
1980s 6,240 t 1.53 million t 1.52 million t Malaysia
1990s 10,842 t 1.07 million t 1.06 million t Malaysia
2000s 13,326 t 1.04 million t 1.03 million t Malaysia
2010s 18,418 t 921,168 t 902,750 t Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rubber — production, Land Locked Developing Countries or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 826,421 t against 19,500 t in Land Locked Developing Countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in rubber — production between Land Locked Developing Countries and Malaysia?
806,921 t, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries and Malaysia?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries and Malaysia rank globally for rubber — production?
Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th and Malaysia ranks 5th of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries vs Malaysia: Rubber — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-production/land-locked-developing-countries/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-production/land-locked-developing-countries/malaysia/">Land Locked Developing Countries vs Malaysia: Rubber — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rubber — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
49 places, 2,597 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.