Belgium-Luxembourg vs Pakistan: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing

Belgium-Luxembourg
621,000 t
in 1999
Pakistan
659,700 t
in 2013
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
18th
Pakistan rank
16th

Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Pakistan
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119872013

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 659,700 t against 621,000 t in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 38,700 t.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 18th and Pakistan ranks 16th of 70 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 3,243 t 95,456 t 92,213 t Pakistan
1970s 3,269 t 223,490 t 220,221 t Pakistan
1980s 274,204 t 209,540 t 64,664 t Belgium-Luxembourg
1990s 560,107 t 260,620 t 299,487 t Belgium-Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed β€” processing, Belgium-Luxembourg or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 659,700 t against 621,000 t in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2013.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed β€” processing between Belgium-Luxembourg and Pakistan?
38,700 t, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Pakistan?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Pakistan rank globally for rape and mustardseed β€” processing?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 18th and Pakistan ranks 16th of 70 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Pakistan: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-processing/belgium-luxembourg/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-processing/belgium-luxembourg/pakistan/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Pakistan: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 4,371 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.