Kyrgyzstan vs Solomon Islands: Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value

Kyrgyzstan
59 kcal/cap/d
in 2024
Solomon Islands
62 kcal/cap/d
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan rank
16th
Solomon Islands rank
13th

Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Solomon Islands
020406080100120200120122024

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 62 kcal/cap/d against 59 kcal/cap/d in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3 kcal/cap/d.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 16th and Solomon Islands ranks 13th of 147 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 81.44 kcal/cap/d 32.44 kcal/cap/d 49 kcal/cap/d Kyrgyzstan
2010s 21.8 kcal/cap/d 25 kcal/cap/d 3.2 kcal/cap/d Solomon Islands
2020s 46.4 kcal/cap/d 42.8 kcal/cap/d 3.6 kcal/cap/d Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value, Kyrgyzstan or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 62 kcal/cap/d against 59 kcal/cap/d in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value between Kyrgyzstan and Solomon Islands?
3 kcal/cap/d, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Solomon Islands?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Solomon Islands rank globally for per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 16th and Solomon Islands ranks 13th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Solomon Islands: Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-food-supply-variability-kcal-cap-day-value/kyrgyz-republic/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-food-supply-variability-kcal-cap-day-value/kyrgyz-republic/solomon-islands/">Kyrgyzstan vs Solomon Islands: Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value
Unit
kcal/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
201 places, 4,843 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.