Oceania vs United Republic of Tanzania: Palmkernel Cake — Feed

Oceania
1.63 million t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
5,499 t
in 2013
Oceania rank
5th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Palmkernel Cake — Feed over time

  • Oceania
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119872013

How they compare

Oceania currently reports 1.63 million t against 5,499 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.62 million t.

That makes Oceania's figure about 296.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Oceania ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 28 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Oceania averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 101.11 t 101.11 t United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 0 t 2,131 t 2,131 t United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 5.6 t 2,696 t 2,690 t United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 9,498 t 3,231 t 6,267 t Oceania
2000s 350,996 t 3,734 t 347,262 t Oceania
2010s 1.37 million t 5,057 t 1.36 million t Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher palmkernel cake — feed, Oceania or United Republic of Tanzania?
Oceania, at 1.63 million t against 5,499 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2013.
What is the difference in palmkernel cake — feed between Oceania and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.62 million t, with Oceania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Oceania and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for palmkernel cake — feed?
Oceania ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Palmkernel Cake — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania vs United Republic of Tanzania: Palmkernel Cake — Feed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palmkernel-cake-feed/oceania/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palmkernel-cake-feed/oceania/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Oceania vs United Republic of Tanzania: Palmkernel Cake — Feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Palmkernel Cake — Feed
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
136 places, 6,803 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.