European Union (27) vs Sierra Leone: Palm kernels β€” Processing

European Union (27)
1,214 t
in 2013
Sierra Leone
28,000 t
in 2013
European Union (27) rank
17th
Sierra Leone rank
17th

Palm kernels β€” Processing over time

  • European Union (27)
  • Sierra Leone
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119872013

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 28,000 t against 1,214 t in European Union (27), a difference of 26,786 t.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 23.1 times European Union (27)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was European Union (27) ahead.

European Union (27) ranks 17th and Sierra Leone ranks 17th of 23 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, European Union (27) averaged higher in 3 and Sierra Leone in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union (27) Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 369,761 t 1,528 t 368,233 t European Union (27)
1970s 231,595 t 14,670 t 216,925 t European Union (27)
1980s 42,368 t 26,450 t 15,918 t European Union (27)
1990s 5,624 t 28,700 t 23,076 t Sierra Leone
2000s 2,737 t 23,050 t 20,313 t Sierra Leone
2010s 609.75 t 25,650 t 25,040 t Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher palm kernels β€” processing, European Union (27) or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 28,000 t against 1,214 t in European Union (27) as of 2013.
What is the difference in palm kernels β€” processing between European Union (27) and Sierra Leone?
26,786 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union (27) and Sierra Leone?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do European Union (27) and Sierra Leone rank globally for palm kernels β€” processing?
European Union (27) ranks 17th and Sierra Leone ranks 17th of 23 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Palm kernels β€” Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union (27) vs Sierra Leone: Palm kernels β€” Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-processing/european-union-27/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-processing/european-union-27/sierra-leone/">European Union (27) vs Sierra Leone: Palm kernels β€” Processing</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Palm kernels β€” Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
81 places, 4,175 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.