China vs Rwanda: Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

China
61.1
in 2024
Rwanda
60.68
in 2024
China rank
40th
Rwanda rank
42nd

Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • China
  • Rwanda
0255075100196119922024

How they compare

China currently reports 61.1 against 60.68 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.42.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 40th and Rwanda ranks 42nd of 50 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 2.83 2.72 0.1044 China
1970s 6.01 9.13 3.11 Rwanda
1980s 10.12 14.95 4.84 Rwanda
1990s 31.38 24.64 6.74 China
2000s 68.42 40.71 27.7 China
2010s 89.13 85.59 3.54 China
2020s 62.5 53.22 9.28 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, China or Rwanda?
China, at 61.1 against 60.68 in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between China and Rwanda?
0.42, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Rwanda rank globally for meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
China ranks 40th and Rwanda ranks 42nd of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Rwanda: Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-rabbits-and-hares-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number-2014/china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-rabbits-and-hares-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number-2014/china/rwanda/">China vs Rwanda: Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
82 places, 4,212 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.