China, Hong Kong SAR vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

China, Hong Kong SAR
852.81
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
405.68
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
2nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
1st

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 852.81 against 405.68 in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 447.13.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 2.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 162 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 812.55 19.73 792.82 China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 982.42 26.22 956.2 China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1,132 45.62 1,087 China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 576.68 69.84 506.85 China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 797.12 91.32 705.8 China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 321.4 123.93 197.47 China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 1,387 342.54 1,044 China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, China, Hong Kong SAR or United Republic of Tanzania?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 852.81 against 405.68 in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania?
447.13, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number-2014/china-hong-kong-sar/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number-2014/china-hong-kong-sar/united-republic-of-tanzania/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
208 places, 12,121 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.