Barbados vs Chile: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per

Barbados
101.71
in 2024
Chile
102.55
in 2024
Barbados rank
66th
Chile rank
64th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per over time

  • Barbados
  • Chile
050100150200250196119922024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 102.55 against 101.71 in Barbados, a difference of 0.84.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 66th and Chile ranks 64th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and Chile in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 101.37 12.39 88.98 Barbados
1970s 181.8 13.18 168.62 Barbados
1980s 187.99 20.16 167.83 Barbados
1990s 113.53 41.55 71.97 Barbados
2000s 82.65 86.13 3.48 Chile
2010s 97.99 101.25 3.26 Chile
2020s 97.21 102.96 5.75 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per, Barbados or Chile?
Chile, at 102.55 against 101.71 in Barbados as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per between Barbados and Chile?
0.84, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Chile?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Chile rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per?
Barbados ranks 66th and Chile ranks 64th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Chile: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production-index/barbados/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production-index/barbados/chile/">Barbados vs Chile: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
208 places, 12,121 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.