Thailand vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Meat of geese, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita

Thailand
60.33
in 2024
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
61.88
in 2024
Thailand rank
32nd
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
31st

Meat of geese, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita over time

  • Thailand
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0100200300400500196119922024

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 61.88 against 60.33 in Thailand, a difference of 1.55.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Thailand ahead.

Thailand ranks 32nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 31st of 36 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Thailand averaged higher in 5 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Thailand United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 441.4 12.06 429.34 Thailand
1970s 286.63 32.44 254.19 Thailand
1980s 194.39 49.7 144.69 Thailand
1990s 165.07 128 37.07 Thailand
2000s 104.4 114.42 10.02 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 98.95 93.2 5.75 Thailand
2020s 75 81.36 6.36 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of geese, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per capita, Thailand or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 61.88 against 60.33 in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of geese, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per capita between Thailand and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
1.55, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Thailand and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for meat of geese, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per capita?
Thailand ranks 32nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 31st of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of geese, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Thailand vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Meat of geese, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-geese-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production-index-number-2014/thailand/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-geese-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production-index-number-2014/thailand/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Thailand vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Meat of geese, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of geese, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
66 places, 3,849 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.