Australia and New Zealand vs Botswana: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita

Australia and New Zealand
114.71
in 2024
Botswana
115.84
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
73rd
Botswana rank
70th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Botswana
0200400600196119922024

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 115.84 against 114.71 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.13.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 73rd and Botswana ranks 70th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Botswana Difference Ahead
1960s 11.61 93.55 81.95 Botswana
1970s 26.34 123.82 97.49 Botswana
1980s 40.94 188.93 147.99 Botswana
1990s 54.65 132.96 78.31 Botswana
2000s 76.29 304.25 227.96 Botswana
2010s 98.22 188.18 89.96 Botswana
2020s 109.04 89.4 19.64 Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per capita, Australia and New Zealand or Botswana?
Botswana, at 115.84 against 114.71 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per capita between Australia and New Zealand and Botswana?
1.13, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Botswana?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Botswana rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per capita?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 73rd and Botswana ranks 70th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Botswana: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production-index-number/australia-and-new-zealand/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production-index-number/australia-and-new-zealand/botswana/">Australia and New Zealand vs Botswana: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
230 places, 13,360 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.