Eswatini vs Guyana: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Eswatini
23.72 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guyana
19.4 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
7th
Guyana rank
8th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guyana
-50-250255075196219932024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 23.72 % change on previous year against 19.4 % change on previous year in Guyana, a difference of 4.32 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 36 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 7th and Guyana ranks 8th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Guyana in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guyana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1763 % change on previous year 3.9 % change on previous year 3.72 % change on previous year Guyana
1970s 4.46 % change on previous year -6.67 % change on previous year 11.13 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s -1.34 % change on previous year 4.41 % change on previous year 5.75 % change on previous year Guyana
1990s -2.12 % change on previous year -0.522 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year Guyana
2000s 6.8 % change on previous year 2.11 % change on previous year 4.69 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s -1.34 % change on previous year 6.6 % change on previous year 7.94 % change on previous year Guyana
2020s 8.71 % change on previous year 3.3 % change on previous year 5.41 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Eswatini or Guyana?
Eswatini, at 23.72 % change on previous year against 19.4 % change on previous year in Guyana as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Eswatini and Guyana?
4.32 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guyana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Guyana rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Eswatini ranks 7th and Guyana ranks 8th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guyana: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/eswatini/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/eswatini/guyana/">Eswatini vs Guyana: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,206 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.