New Zealand vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

New Zealand
0.6035 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.7344 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
New Zealand rank
2nd
Uruguay rank
1st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • New Zealand
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.60.8196119922024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.7344 1000 Int$ per person against 0.6035 1000 Int$ per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1309 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

New Zealand ranks 2nd and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4853 1000 Int$ per person 0.4817 1000 Int$ per person 0.0035 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
1970s 0.6846 1000 Int$ per person 0.4892 1000 Int$ per person 0.1954 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
1980s 0.681 1000 Int$ per person 0.4976 1000 Int$ per person 0.1835 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
1990s 0.6789 1000 Int$ per person 0.508 1000 Int$ per person 0.1709 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
2000s 0.6628 1000 Int$ per person 0.6328 1000 Int$ per person 0.03 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
2010s 0.6061 1000 Int$ per person 0.6905 1000 Int$ per person 0.0844 1000 Int$ per person Uruguay
2020s 0.6169 1000 Int$ per person 0.7298 1000 Int$ per person 0.1129 1000 Int$ per person Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, New Zealand or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.7344 1000 Int$ per person against 0.6035 1000 Int$ per person in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between New Zealand and Uruguay?
0.1309 1000 Int$ per person, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
New Zealand ranks 2nd and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/new-zealand/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/new-zealand/uruguay/">New Zealand vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.