New Caledonia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

New Caledonia
0.0439 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Zambia
0.0448 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
51st
Zambia rank
49th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zambia
00.050.10.15196119922024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0448 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0439 1000 Int$ per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 51st and Zambia ranks 49th of 167 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1477 1000 Int$ per person 0.0284 1000 Int$ per person 0.1192 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
1970s 0.0962 1000 Int$ per person 0.0232 1000 Int$ per person 0.073 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
1980s 0.07 1000 Int$ per person 0.0203 1000 Int$ per person 0.0497 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
1990s 0.065 1000 Int$ per person 0.0305 1000 Int$ per person 0.0345 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
2000s 0.0548 1000 Int$ per person 0.0254 1000 Int$ per person 0.0294 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
2010s 0.0509 1000 Int$ per person 0.0472 1000 Int$ per person 0.0037 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0459 1000 Int$ per person 0.0425 1000 Int$ per person 0.0034 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, New Caledonia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0448 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0439 1000 Int$ per person in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between New Caledonia and Zambia?
0.0009 1000 Int$ per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zambia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Zambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
New Caledonia ranks 51st and Zambia ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/new-caledonia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/new-caledonia/zambia/">New Caledonia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.