Hungary vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Hungary
0.0125 1000 Int$ per person
in 2017
Rwanda
0.0127 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Hungary rank
99th
Rwanda rank
97th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Hungary
  • Rwanda
00.020.040.06196119922024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0127 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0125 1000 Int$ per person in Hungary, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 99th and Rwanda ranks 97th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0465 1000 Int$ per person 0.0068 1000 Int$ per person 0.0398 1000 Int$ per person Hungary
1970s 0.0527 1000 Int$ per person 0.0083 1000 Int$ per person 0.0443 1000 Int$ per person Hungary
1980s 0.0532 1000 Int$ per person 0.0093 1000 Int$ per person 0.0439 1000 Int$ per person Hungary
1990s 0.0329 1000 Int$ per person 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person 0.0252 1000 Int$ per person Hungary
2000s 0.0172 1000 Int$ per person 0.0122 1000 Int$ per person 0.005 1000 Int$ per person Hungary
2010s 0.0115 1000 Int$ per person 0.0117 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Hungary or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.0127 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0125 1000 Int$ per person in Hungary as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Hungary and Rwanda?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Rwanda?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Hungary and Rwanda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Hungary ranks 99th and Rwanda ranks 97th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/hungary/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/hungary/rwanda/">Hungary vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.