How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?

13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Croatia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Croatia

0.0445 1000 Int$ per person

in 2017

Zambia

0.0448 1000 Int$ per person

in 2024

Croatia rank

50th

Zambia rank

49th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Croatia
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0448 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0445 1000 Int$ per person in Croatia, a difference of 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zambia ahead.

Croatia ranks 50th and Zambia ranks 49th of 167 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Croatia	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0065 1000 Int$ per person	0.0254 1000 Int$ per person	0.0189 1000 Int$ per person	Zambia
2010s	0.0287 1000 Int$ per person	0.0481 1000 Int$ per person	0.0194 1000 Int$ per person	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Croatia or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0.0448 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0445 1000 Int$ per person in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Croatia and Zambia?: 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?: 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
How do Croatia and Zambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Croatia ranks 50th and Zambia ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/croatia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/croatia/zambia/">Croatia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit: 1000 Int$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 28 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.