Chile vs New Caledonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Chile
0.0431 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
0.0439 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Chile rank
52nd
New Caledonia rank
51st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Chile
  • New Caledonia
0.050.10.15196119922024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0439 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0431 1000 Int$ per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Chile ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 51st of 167 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0587 1000 Int$ per person 0.1477 1000 Int$ per person 0.089 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
1970s 0.0602 1000 Int$ per person 0.0962 1000 Int$ per person 0.036 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
1980s 0.066 1000 Int$ per person 0.07 1000 Int$ per person 0.004 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
1990s 0.0717 1000 Int$ per person 0.0811 1000 Int$ per person 0.0094 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
2000s 0.0579 1000 Int$ per person 0.0647 1000 Int$ per person 0.0068 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
2010s 0.0496 1000 Int$ per person 0.0509 1000 Int$ per person 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0444 1000 Int$ per person 0.0459 1000 Int$ per person 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chile or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.0439 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0431 1000 Int$ per person in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chile and New Caledonia?
0.0008 1000 Int$ per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Caledonia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and New Caledonia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chile ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 51st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Caledonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/chile/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/chile/new-caledonia/">Chile vs New Caledonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.