Botswana vs Nicaragua: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Botswana
0.1108 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Nicaragua
0.096 1000 Int$ per person
in 2023
Botswana rank
17th
Nicaragua rank
19th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Botswana
  • Nicaragua
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922024

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.1108 1000 Int$ per person against 0.096 1000 Int$ per person in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0148 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 17th and Nicaragua ranks 19th of 167 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1672 1000 Int$ per person 0.0777 1000 Int$ per person 0.0895 1000 Int$ per person Botswana
1970s 0.2237 1000 Int$ per person 0.1042 1000 Int$ per person 0.1194 1000 Int$ per person Botswana
1980s 0.1596 1000 Int$ per person 0.0536 1000 Int$ per person 0.106 1000 Int$ per person Botswana
1990s 0.118 1000 Int$ per person 0.0469 1000 Int$ per person 0.0712 1000 Int$ per person Botswana
2000s 0.0772 1000 Int$ per person 0.0613 1000 Int$ per person 0.0158 1000 Int$ per person Botswana
2010s 0.1018 1000 Int$ per person 0.0894 1000 Int$ per person 0.0124 1000 Int$ per person Botswana
2020s 0.1233 1000 Int$ per person 0.1005 1000 Int$ per person 0.0228 1000 Int$ per person Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Botswana or Nicaragua?
Botswana, at 0.1108 1000 Int$ per person against 0.096 1000 Int$ per person in Nicaragua as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Botswana and Nicaragua?
0.0148 1000 Int$ per person, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Nicaragua rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Botswana ranks 17th and Nicaragua ranks 19th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Nicaragua: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/botswana/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/botswana/nicaragua/">Botswana vs Nicaragua: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.