Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Bhutan
0.0077 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0077 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
118th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
119th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Bhutan
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922024

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 118th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 119th of 167 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0441 1000 Int$ per person 0.0057 1000 Int$ per person 0.0385 1000 Int$ per person Bhutan
1970s 0.0413 1000 Int$ per person 0.003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0382 1000 Int$ per person Bhutan
1980s 0.0401 1000 Int$ per person 0.0032 1000 Int$ per person 0.0369 1000 Int$ per person Bhutan
1990s 0.0052 1000 Int$ per person 0.0031 1000 Int$ per person 0.0021 1000 Int$ per person Bhutan
2000s 0.0041 1000 Int$ per person 0.0032 1000 Int$ per person 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person Bhutan
2010s 0.0042 1000 Int$ per person 0.0037 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person Bhutan
2020s 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person 0.006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0017 1000 Int$ per person Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Bhutan or Sao Tome and Principe?
Bhutan, at 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 1000 Int$ per person, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Bhutan ranks 118th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 119th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/bhutan/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/bhutan/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.