Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Bangladesh
0.0051 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0.0041 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
131st
Sri Lanka rank
134th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sri Lanka
0.0040.0060.0080.010.012196119922024

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0.0051 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0041 1000 Int$ per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.001 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 131st and Sri Lanka ranks 134th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0092 1000 Int$ per person 0.0119 1000 Int$ per person 0.0027 1000 Int$ per person Sri Lanka
1970s 0.0083 1000 Int$ per person 0.01 1000 Int$ per person 0.0017 1000 Int$ per person Sri Lanka
1980s 0.0056 1000 Int$ per person 0.0068 1000 Int$ per person 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person Sri Lanka
1990s 0.0053 1000 Int$ per person 0.006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person Sri Lanka
2000s 0.0054 1000 Int$ per person 0.0057 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person Sri Lanka
2010s 0.0052 1000 Int$ per person 0.0046 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person Bangladesh
2020s 0.0051 1000 Int$ per person 0.0039 1000 Int$ per person 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Bangladesh or Sri Lanka?
Bangladesh, at 0.0051 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0041 1000 Int$ per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
0.001 1000 Int$ per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Sri Lanka rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Bangladesh ranks 131st and Sri Lanka ranks 134th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/bangladesh/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/bangladesh/sri-lanka/">Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.