Argentina vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Argentina
0.2993 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
New Zealand
0.6035 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Argentina rank
5th
New Zealand rank
2nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Argentina
  • New Zealand
0.20.40.60.8196119922024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.6035 1000 Int$ per person against 0.2993 1000 Int$ per person in Argentina, a difference of 0.3042 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.0 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 167 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.463 1000 Int$ per person 0.4853 1000 Int$ per person 0.0223 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
1970s 0.4259 1000 Int$ per person 0.6846 1000 Int$ per person 0.2587 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
1980s 0.3844 1000 Int$ per person 0.681 1000 Int$ per person 0.2966 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
1990s 0.3418 1000 Int$ per person 0.6789 1000 Int$ per person 0.3371 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
2000s 0.322 1000 Int$ per person 0.6628 1000 Int$ per person 0.3408 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
2010s 0.2751 1000 Int$ per person 0.6061 1000 Int$ per person 0.3311 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand
2020s 0.2987 1000 Int$ per person 0.6169 1000 Int$ per person 0.3182 1000 Int$ per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Argentina or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.6035 1000 Int$ per person against 0.2993 1000 Int$ per person in Argentina as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Argentina and New Zealand?
0.3042 1000 Int$ per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and New Zealand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Argentina and New Zealand rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Argentina ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/argentina/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/argentina/new-zealand/">Argentina vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.