Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Türkiye: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
126.92
in 2024
Türkiye
161.09
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
6th
Türkiye rank
5th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Türkiye
050100150200196119922024

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 161.09 against 126.92 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 34.17.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.3 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 6th and Türkiye ranks 5th of 29 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 6 and Türkiye in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Türkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 25.2 12.26 12.94 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 31.3 14.14 17.16 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 38.25 33.36 4.89 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 55.66 37.82 17.83 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 75.19 61.83 13.36 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 101.06 97.61 3.45 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 120.45 165.98 45.53 Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 161.09 against 126.92 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Türkiye?
34.17, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Türkiye?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Türkiye rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 6th and Türkiye ranks 5th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Türkiye: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkiye-2/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Türkiye: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
226 places, 13,069 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.