China, Hong Kong SAR vs China, Macao SAR: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

China, Hong Kong SAR
205.61
in 2024
China, Macao SAR
224.28
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
7th
China, Macao SAR rank
5th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • China, Macao SAR
0100200300196119922024

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 224.28 against 205.61 in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 18.67.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 7th and China, Macao SAR ranks 5th of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 5 and China, Macao SAR in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR China, Macao SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 135.46 0.75 134.71 China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.015 0.688 0.673 China, Macao SAR
1980s 13.16 0.584 12.58 China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 3.84 3.13 0.702 China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 3.26 4.86 1.59 China, Macao SAR
2010s 73.21 30.34 42.86 China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 165.74 159.95 5.8 China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, China, Hong Kong SAR or China, Macao SAR?
China, Macao SAR, at 224.28 against 205.61 in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between China, Hong Kong SAR and China, Macao SAR?
18.67, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and China, Macao SAR?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and China, Macao SAR rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 7th and China, Macao SAR ranks 5th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs China, Macao SAR: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production/china-hong-kong-sar/china-macao-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production/china-hong-kong-sar/china-macao-sar/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs China, Macao SAR: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
226 places, 13,069 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.