Australia vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)

Australia
1,578 LCU
in 2015
Panama
883 LCU
in 2003
Australia rank
111th
Panama rank
114th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) over time

  • Australia
  • Panama
05001.0k1.5k199120032015

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1,578 LCU against 883 LCU in Panama, a difference of 695 LCU.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.8 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 111th and Panama ranks 114th of 114 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 1,019 LCU 1,028 LCU 9.25 LCU Panama
2000s 1,396 LCU 999.75 LCU 396.25 LCU Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological), Australia or Panama?
Australia, at 1,578 LCU against 883 LCU in Panama as of 2015.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) between Australia and Panama?
695 LCU, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Panama?
12 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2003.
How do Australia and Panama rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)?
Australia ranks 111th and Panama ranks 114th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price (LCU/tonne). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-lcu-tonne-2/australia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-lcu-tonne-2/australia/panama/">Australia vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price (LCU/tonne)
Unit
LCU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
123 places, 2,754 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

This sub-domain contains data on agriculture producer prices and the producer price index. Agriculture producer prices are prices received by farmers for primary crops, live animals and livestock primary products as collected at the point of initial sale (prices paid at the farm gate). Annual data are provided from 1991 (while mothly data start in January 2010) for 180 countries and 212 products. The producer price index is the index of agricultural producer prices that measures the average annual change over time in the selling prices received by farmers (prices at the farm gate or at the first point of sale). The three categories of producer price index available in FAOSTAT comprise: single-item price index, commodity group index and the agriculture producer price index.